Project intelligence for Business Analysts
From the first stakeholder conversation to the final handover, Antozoe turns what was said into governed requirements, user stories, business rules and process maps, surfaces what is still unresolved instead of settling it quietly, and leaves every decision to you.
For people who listen before they build.
The problem
A discovery call runs for an hour. What survives it is a page of notes, an action list, and whatever the analyst still remembers a fortnight later when someone asks why a requirement says what it says.
Nothing in that is anyone's fault, and none of it is unusual. It is what happens when the record of a conversation and the work that came out of it live in different places, owned by different people, updated at different times — and it is why the second half of a project is so often spent reconstructing the first.
The idea
Not write your requirements for you. The six behaviours below are what a competent colleague does on an engagement, and they are the specification Antozoe is built against — each one is a capability further down this page, not an aspiration.
Start from what people actually said.
Upload the transcript, the workshop notes, the source document. The analysis works from that record rather than from a blank page and a prompt.
Keep the project's own record.
Requirements, user stories, business rules and process maps live together on the project they belong to, scoped to their organisation and project on every request, and they are still there next session.
Hold together what belongs together.
Where Antozoe captured the transcript and analysis session an artefact came from, it keeps them attached to it — so “where did this come from” has an answer that is not somebody's memory.
Have the groundwork ready before the review.
A run returns structured artefacts carrying a MoSCoW priority and an approval status, so a validation session starts with something worth reacting to instead of a blank template.
Say what is missing.
Open questions, thin evidence and statements that contradict each other are surfaced as gaps and left open, rather than smoothed into a paragraph that reads well and settles nothing.
Leave the decision with the practitioner.
Where the evidence does not settle something, Antozoe marks it unresolved instead of choosing. No suggested version becomes the current one until a person selects it — every time, no exceptions.
Where the evidence stops, the guesswork stops.
The project journey
A requirement usually begins as something a stakeholder said out loud. By the time it reaches a delivery team the conversation is gone, and what survives is whoever's notes were fastest to write and slowest to question. These five beats are Antozoe's answer to that, in order.
A workshop, a discovery call, a stakeholder interview. Upload the transcript, the workshop notes, the source document. Antozoe reads what was said and who said it — stakeholders, decisions, pain points, business rules, risks.
Business rules, architecture requirements and gap items can keep the transcript, timestamp and speaker they came from; other extracted artefacts can record the analysis session behind them. Where that provenance was captured, Antozoe shows it — never just “AI generated.”
Open questions and conflicting statements are surfaced for a human to resolve, never quietly decided for you. Where the record is thin, Antozoe says so and leaves the gap open until someone closes it.
Add new evidence as the engagement continues, and Antozoe compares it against what is already there and proposes changes. Once a BA manually edits an artefact, it's locked. Antozoe can never silently overwrite or reclassify a locked item on a later run.
New AI-suggested versions are never made current automatically. A BA reviews and chooses in Final Selection — every time, no exceptions.
Zoe
Antozoe is where a project's knowledge lives. Zoe is how you talk to it. Ask what the project already says about a process, what is still unresolved, or where an artefact sits — and the answer comes from the requirements, user stories, business rules and open questions on that project, the same records you can open yourself.
Zoe reads. She does not write. She cannot create an artefact, edit one, approve one, or make a version current — those stay with you. Available to Analyst and Admin roles on Pro and Business plans.
Stakeholder review
Share a project with a stakeholder as a Client Portal link. They see the current requirements, user stories and process diagrams you chose to publish, and they respond on each one: approve it, reject it, or ask for clarification. A comment lands against the requirement it is about, and the analyst who created the link is told when a decision is made.
Handover
Export the project as a Delivery Pack: a Word document carrying the requirements, user stories, recommendations, process steps and gap analysis, with the project context they were produced in. Where a lineage still has a choice nobody has made, the pack says so on its cover instead of picking one and printing it as settled.
Trust
A tool that governs someone else's evidence has to be legible about its own limits. These are commitments about the product, not aspirations about the category.
No analysis run makes its result the current version. A person reviews the alternatives in Final Selection and chooses one, on every change, without exception.
The moment you edit an artefact by hand it is locked, and later runs leave it alone. Your correction is not a suggestion the next run gets to reconsider.
Extracted artefacts can record the analysis session behind them, and business rules, architecture requirements and gap items can carry a transcript, a timestamp and a speaker too. Where Antozoe captured that provenance it shows it, and where it did not, the artefact does not pretend otherwise.
You will not find a productivity figure, an efficiency claim or a customer result anywhere on this site. If we cannot name the numerator, the denominator and the date it was true, we do not print it.
Capabilities appear here when they exist in the product and a person can use them today, not when they reach a roadmap. Anything still being built is labelled as such where it appears.
An open question left visible is worth more than a tidy answer nobody checked. Antozoe would rather show you the hole in the evidence than fill it in for you.
Method
Five stages, applied to every conversation Antozoe processes. It is the working method inside the arc above, not a separate promise beside it.
Capture stakeholder evidence
Identify requirements, decisions, risks and business rules
Resolve gaps, ambiguity and conflict
Generate governed delivery artefacts
Publish an approved delivery package
Builders Who Listen
Builder is not a job title here. It is the analyst, architect, delivery lead, tester or consultant who turns a conversation into something another person has to rely on.
Builders Who Listen start with the record, ask before they assume, keep gaps visible, show their work, and leave judgement with the people accountable for the outcome.
Built for today
The point of view is broad. The product starts with the practitioners below.
You run the workshops, write the requirements, and defend them in review. Antozoe keeps the evidence attached so you can show your work instead of reconstructing it from memory the week before sign-off.
Multiple clients, multiple engagements, and a reputation that depends on the quality of the record you hand over. Each project keeps its own governed history, scoped to its organisation and project on every request.
Hosting and security
Hosted in Australia is not the same as never leaving Australia. Analysis runs through AI subprocessors, and the regions they process in are named in our Privacy Policy rather than glossed over here.
Read the Privacy Policy — including the subprocessor list and the data-residency statement.
See it run
No recording is published yet. When one is, it will show a real session in the product — the same screens as the arc above, in sequence, at ordinary speed. Nothing here is a rendering of a product that does not exist.
In the meantime, the free trial is the demo.
Standard support
$39 USD/mo
≈ A$60 AUD/mo (approx.)
14-day free trial · cancel anytime
Included workspaces
Priority support
$99 USD/mo
≈ A$151 AUD/mo (approx.)
14-day free trial · cancel anytime
Included workspaces
Priority support
$269 USD/mo
≈ A$412 AUD/mo (approx.)
14-day free trial · cancel anytime
Included workspaces
Custom pricing
Source traceability, manual-edit locking, and full audit history are included on every plan.
Top up your plan any time.
+5 customers
Add 5 more customer slots.
$6.00 USD / month
Billed monthly · cancel anytime
+15 customers
Add 15 more customer slots.
$12.00 USD / month
Billed monthly · cancel anytime
+50 customers
Add 50 more customer slots.
$25.00 USD / month
Billed monthly · cancel anytime
+5 viewer seats
Add 5 client-portal viewer seats.
$12.00 USD / month
Billed monthly · cancel anytime
+10 viewer seats
Add 10 client-portal viewer seats.
$22.00 USD / month
Billed monthly · cancel anytime
+20 viewer seats
Add 20 client-portal viewer seats.
$38.00 USD / month
Billed monthly · cancel anytime
+1 archive year
Extend archive retention by one year.
$19.00 USD one-time
One-time purchase
Archive bundle
Extended multi-year archive access.
$65.00 USD / month
Billed monthly · cancel anytime
Prices in USD. AUD figures are indicative only, converted at an approximate rate of A$1.53 per US$1. You will be billed in USD.
Writing
Longer pieces on requirements practice, traceability and what a business analyst is actually accountable for.
Requirements Practice
A practical manifesto for analysts, architects, testers, delivery leads and consultants who listen before they write, keep uncertainty visible and show how decisions were reached.
FLOW Methodology
Industry Benchmark Intelligence